Preflop: Hero is SB with , .
UTG calls, 6 folds, Button calls, Hero completes, BB checks.
Flop: (4 SB) , , (4 players)
Hero bets, BB calls, UTG folds, Button raises, Hero calls, BB folds.
Turn: (4.50 BB) (2 players)
Hero bets, Button raises, Hero calls.
River: (8.50 BB) (2 players)
Hero checks, Button checks.
Final Pot: 8.50 BB
Results in white below:
Hero has Jd Kh (one pair, kings).
Button has Th Ks (two pair, kings and tens).
Outcome: Button wins 8.50 BB.
Can't fault the guy there--my gin card happened to be HIS gin card. When I tossed out the bet with overcards on the flop and he raised, I figured he may be raising to guard against a flush draw. He seemed to be a bit over-aggressive, raising flops to take pots down right there. I just didn't put him on KT.
This one? Bad.
PokerStars 5/10 Hold'em (9 handed)
Preflop: Hero is SB with , .
7 folds, Hero raises, BB calls.
Flop: (4 SB) , , (2 players)
Hero bets, BB calls.
Turn: (3 BB) (2 players)
Hero bets, BB raises, Hero calls.
River: (7 BB) (2 players)
Hero checks, BB bets, Hero calls.
Final Pot: 9 BB
Results in white below:
Hero has Qc Qs (one pair, queens).
BB has Ac 3h (straight, six high).
Outcome: BB wins 9 BB.
He probably figured me for a steal, and I don't blame him. He just caught his best card. When he raised, the alarm in my head went off and I said, "That lousy SOB has A3." Couldn't let it go.
Another bad one. He's behind the WHOLE way, and I bet like he is. Of course, he hits his river card.
PokerStars 5/10 Hold'em (9 handed)
Preflop: Hero is BB with , .
5 folds, CO raises, 2 folds, Hero calls.
Flop: (4.40 SB) , , (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets, Hero raises, CO calls.
Turn: (4.20 BB) (2 players)
Hero bets, CO calls.
River: (6.20 BB) (2 players)
Hero bets, CO raises, Hero calls.
Final Pot: 10.20 BB
I probably should have dumped Hand 1 pre-flop, but who knew I would be ahead? Ahead until those pesky flop cards...Second hand? I think I played it optimally. Third? Anybody play it differently? Maybe re-raise pre-flop with AQs?Statistics: Posted by Tiburon — Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:21 am
]]>