]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
It's like a freaking desert here. I'll try to get a few replies at 2+2 instead.
Yeah... I hear ya man. I've been doing the same lately. Oftentimes after my sessions I'll provide a few posts with hands where I was unsure what to do, or simply interesting hands that could spur a discussion. And then one person responds two days later.
I prefer the personalities on this forum, but this is far from a majorly active forum.
Statistics: Posted by EscapePlan9 — Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:10 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
It's like a freaking desert here.
I'll try to get a few replies at 2+2 instead.Statistics: Posted by majakovskij — Thu Oct 06, 2005 1:55 pm
]]>
Chip Reese and Barry Greenstein would not do terrible in a small game. They didn't become two of the most successful cash game players ever by not being able to adjust. I'm pretty confident they could apply a different strategy than they use in their $4000/$8000 game.
B)
$5/$10 isn't exactly full of sharks. I quad table $10/$20 and am more or less on auto pilot. I've played $30/$60, and it's not exactly a mental strain.
That being said, if you have a big enough bankroll where a $250 loss won't kill you and you don't think you'll play with scared money, which you probably will, go ahead and plop yourself down at a juicy $5/$10 game.
Statistics: Posted by Xaston — Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:53 am
]]>
Is this totally absurd? Am I setting myself up the spanking of the year?
Statistics: Posted by majakovskij — Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:27 am
]]>