]]>
For what it's worth....
Statistics: Posted by The A Train — Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:38 pm
]]>
i want a site that:
- gives a good rakeback based on action... great rakeback to attentive and/or good customers. pokerchamps has it almost perfect. i think that i should be getting 30-50%. make sure that whatever system that is used screws the ubertight bonuswhores. i want a site to reward ACTION with bonuses and/or rakeback.
- i want a site that uses it's marketing money to attract new, loose players. there is a bottomless pit of people who want to play poker online, and i want a site that aggressively aims to get these players. how to do so, well, that's your job.
- ok, i'm a softy... one idea... i think some sort of trust-building (e.g., Party's beginner's tables) are the right idea. basically, there needs to be a low-risk system so that people don't think online poker is a scam. small deposits, soft shark-proof tables, fast and easy cash-in and cash-out. even helping someone open a neteller account would be a move in the right direction.
most of my other specific comments have been addresses by other posts. overall, i would like the software to be designed by people who actually play poker online. this is clearly not the case now.
anyway, no poker site is close to being perfect. party is the best, imho, due to the wide availability of games and the easy to clear bonuses. that being said, the software needs improvement and the bonuses need to be less rewarding for ubertight bonuswhores.
Statistics: Posted by Kuso — Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:19 am
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
Unfortunately, I think you and I are the only ones who thought it was a good idear. Oh well, you can't get a sticky post and I, well, .......... I can't find a cool Boobie avatar to put under my name!!!
Statistics: Posted by SebQtaneus — Mon Sep 12, 2005 10:28 pm
]]>
]]>
-Seb
Statistics: Posted by SebQtaneus — Fri Sep 09, 2005 12:02 am
]]>
More table selection information would be nice, but it's information that would be available to everybody. And it might start them thinking. I don't want the fishies even thinking about what VPIP means, let alone that it might be a good thing to learn about themselves or other people!
So I'm going to have to vote against those two.
My perfect site would have the software running very smoothly, and it would be CUSTOMIZABLE. If you hate the "minbet" button you could change it to a "bet pot" or "bet 3/4 pot" button if you wanted. If you wanted more information on tables, you could get that information, but you would have to go looking for it. That way, the fishies wouldn't learn anything or play better, but it would make my life easier.
Another example is the "call any bet" and "raise any bet" pre-check boxes that some sites have. These options makes NO sense at no-limit, and I never click them. I would like to make it possible to get rid of them. But at the same time, I do not want them gone because any time I see action that indicates somebody has clicked one of them, I know that I have found myself a 100% guaranteed fish.
Another example of customization is seating selection. Prima will let you select where you sit at every table, which is really nice. You can just set it once and then every time you sit down it always puts you in the same place! I always sit bottom right, right above the action buttons. I've never played another site that let you do that so easily.
Statistics: Posted by k3nt — Wed Sep 07, 2005 12:58 pm
]]>
]]>