also 'All players must be playing at real money (£)' and the fuller description makes it clear that you must be playing at the £ sterling tables
Statistics: Posted by excession — Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:19 pm
]]>
]]>
The Cryptos rake is calculated in the same currency as the table so the max isn't $3 it's £3 - so if you are playing these tables you will be paying significantly more rake (up to 75% more on any contested hands probably).
Now it may be precisely because of this that the £1/2 tables are fishy as hell (I don't know I've not played em) but you do need to bear it in mind when saying that you 'may as well' play them
Statistics: Posted by excession — Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:46 am
]]>
I think the £25 for 5 hrs ones comprise William Hill (by coincidence my first ever site), Ritz, Uk Betting and TotalBet. You can multitable 4 tables to release the £25 in 75 minutes at NL $100 tables. That's $175 in 5 hours play. Compare that to trying to release a PS, UB or Empire bonus at $100 NL and you can see why they are my first stop...
I did sign up for the Empire $100 bonus but after taking a look at the tables am not going to bother even trying for it..
Also the players are piss-poor - A typical classic one from last night came when my AA got re-raised - I re-re-raised all in and got a caller ($75 stack) with AQo
Statistics: Posted by excession — Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:32 am
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>