2. What is the longest / worst downswing you guys have had?
3. How did you cope with it?
4. Is 6-max more swingy than FR and if so why?
i'll try to answer these as best as i can.
1: your graph shows you as a consistant winning player at those stakes over 50k hands before your downswing. without any more information on the way you play your hands it's impossible to be sure, but a lot of people would ( i think) agree that being a good player in poker is defined as being a winning player. That doesn't mean a winning player over the course of a single session, or a single tournament, or even a week or a month. It means in the long run. It's simply 'can you reasonably expect to win money when you sit down". It has nothing to do with how much you are up or down over the last however long. Judging by your first 50k hands, it looks as though you are a winning player.
2: My biggest downswing was, i believe, -20 buy ins. given, I play at limits way below what my roll can handle, but it certainly was frustrating.
3: I cope with it much the same way you did. I take a break, and then I come back and move down to a lower stake. My goal is typically to make back whatever I've lost at the higher stake before I'm ready to move back up.
to put that in actual dollar terms... I went on a 10 buyin downswing at 2/4nl in febuary. that's $4000 (ish). Once I decided I was sick of getting creamed, i took a week or so off. No poker. no BTP. I just stayed away from it. Then I came back and tried to objectively analyze as many of my big hands as possible - both the winning and losing ones. I tried to be honest with myself about what sort of mistakes I was making. I then dropped down to 1/2, and proceeded to play there until I had made back most of the $4000. After that I just went back up to 2/4.
In other words, take breaks. move down to a limit you know you can beat, and don't worry that you're making less money there. It took me 3 weeks to lose 4k at 2/4, and probably 5 weeks to make it back at 1/2. I can't stress this enough - don't worry about the fact that you're making tiny amounts/hour. I started with a bank roll of $50, and I played penny stakes for 3 months before I even tried 25nl. It was almost a full year before I ever ventured to 100nl, and another 6 months before 1/2, and another 9 months before 2/4. It takes time. You have to be willing to pay your dues at the lower limits to build up your bank roll. Just grind it out, work on your game, and you'll be able to get back to the point where you're making more than $50/hour. But if you get frustrated and move up too quick without putting in the work that you need to, you won't ever get there.
There's tons of good players who weren't ever willing to put in the time at the lower limits and went broke because they moved up too fast. There's only a handful of guys who made that attempt and came through ahead.
As far as your last question about swings, the answer is yes and no. For most players at 6-max, playing more hands means having more opportunities to make mistakes. With the exception of the top tier players at any limit, everyones going to make mistakes, and you're simply going to make more of them when you play more hands.
Hope that long winded response is somewhat useful.Statistics: Posted by Stelvask — Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:56 pm
]]>