thanks
Statistics: Posted by kdiddy33 — Tue Jul 12, 2005 9:11 am
]]>
]]>
By playing 5 SNGs at the same time, I generally don't have much of a read on the players and merely play the cards. I think my numbers will improve by playing fewer tables.
Statistics: Posted by kdiddy33 — Tue Jul 12, 2005 7:35 am
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
For whatever reason, I just haven't become too fond of Party Poker as a site. I've almost signed up several times, played with some fake money and stuff. The big benefit to FT is you start with $1500 in chips as opposed to the $800 in Party. I'm sure I'll throw some cash on there eventually and give it a shot too.
Do you find the same true at UB or have you not played there?
Statistics: Posted by kdiddy33 — Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:54 am
]]>
]]>
180 games on Ultimate Bet
total won.........$1,085
total wagered..$990
Plus/Minus.....$95
ITM%.............39%
ROI%.............10%
176 games on Pacific Poker
total won........$1,375
total wagered.$968
Plus/Minus $407
ITM%52%
ROI%42%
61 games on Full Tilt
total won........$477
total wagered.$336
Plus/Minus......$142
ITM%..............59%
ROI%.............42%
I think you guys know where I'm going with this. While the sample is not huge, I decided to run my numbers to see if what I "felt" about UB was accurate. I believe that the caliber of players at UB are better than at the other sites I mentioned. As a result, I have shut it down at UB and am moving to Full Tilt - Full Time, to see if I'm sitting on a luck box, or if these numbers can be maintained (ITM not likely of course).
Also moving to the $11s on FT.
Thoughts, go? PS, Flafishy, I hollered at you on UB the other night, but I think you had your chat feature off.
Statistics: Posted by kdiddy33 — Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:05 am
]]>