by MozMan » Sun Nov 21, 2004 2:07 am
Ahh, I see what you mean.
I think that, basically, starting/raising hands become significantly less important short-handed, or at least must be viewed differently. In fact, a certain dichotomy develops where you begin to have more starting hands that warrant raises (under certain circumstances) that do NOT warrant limping. In fact, there will be times that you will call raises pre-flop with hands that you wouldn't limp with in the same game.
For example, in a short-handed game (especially against weak or tight competition) you should be putting in a lot of raises from the cutoff or button, almost regardless of your hand and almost with reckless abandon. The potential for pot-stealing is just too great. If, however, there are displays of strength (ie, a raise) before you in the same situation, folding should be seriously considered on all but the strongest of your hands.
In the blinds, you need to defend much more often, also because the potential for pot-stealing is so great. When you are in the blinds, one player folds, the cutoff raises and the button folds, there is a significantly higher chance that the cutoff is trying to steal, making many more of your marginal holdings profitable.
Of course, much of this depends on your opposition, too. If you are playing a table where the other players play short-handed well, then you want to try to see a lot of flops cheap. Limp any time you think they will let you get away with it, and bet the hell out of anything that catches, and drop anything that doesn't. Kind of a loose-passive preflop and tight-aggressive post-flop mentality. It's kind of hard to shift gears mid-hand like that, but can really keep the opposition off balance.