Playing a live 1/2 NL game, I am on the button, when a TAG player raises to 12 from EP. He has about $300 and I've got him covered. I call from the button and everyone else folds.
FLOP: [9h][4d] (Pot: $27)
He bets $25. I call.
TURN: (Pot: $77)
He bets $60. I call again.
RIVER: (Pot: $197)
He checks. I move-in. He calls for his last $200.
You might be wondering what I had. I played the hand like a clueless calling station. Most people keep calling bets when they have some sort of a draw. That's exactly what I wanted my opponent to think I had. Something like [Jh] or [Qh]. It was quite apparent to everyone that he had a big pair. I knew he would want to protect his big pair, but if I raised the flop, would he bet big again on the turn? Unlikely, given that he was tight and fairly solid. So I smooth-called, and as expected, he led out again. I again called, as I only wanted to reinforce his read that I had a draw. When the river missed, I decided to move all-in, hoping that he would think I missed my draw. It looks like this is exactly what he thought as he called within 5 seconds. He mucked, but I'm 99% sure he had KK-AA. I had the [Ts].
What do you think about representing a draw while having a monster? In the past, I've had so many instances where I drove out big pairs when I hit sets by playing them fast - this is necessary in multi-way pots and with calling stations, but against a tight player, he is capable of laying it down, and since I was sure that he wasn't on a draw himself, I thought I could represent the heart draw and make a big "bluff" at the end if the heart missed. Of course if it came I would probably get paid off less, but I was willing to take the chance since it will miss most of the time. Comments?