by dropthe72 » Thu Apr 17, 2008 7:35 pm
oh ho.
we have a person doing logical fucking analysis. lookie here. too bad you don't actually have the mental capacity to make a proper judgment.
"i like him even if you don't".
well why would i be emphasizing this issue? think about it (it's hard, i know, but you can muster a thought if you try).
because that's why he was fucking banned.
because people didn't fucking like him.
yes that is correct.
so people keep bringing into this debacle this whole shobute/bk deal. well let me ask you a hypothetical question. if some douchebag on this forum (and chances are likely on this forum that it will in fact be a douchebag) got into a deal or arrangement on a staking deal with another and someone lost money. would it be fair to blame btp?
is btp liable?
FUCK NO. IT WOULD BE YOUR OWN DUMBASS FAULT. i never read in the tos of this site that btp actively manages 'fairness' on the deals going on here. that would be unrealistic and fucking retarded.
a deal gone wrong between two friends, and i presume they consider[ed] themselves friends first and btp-ers second. so what deal is it of btp? none. unless some people have an agenda against a guy they don't like. then they 'use' this issue to fucking ban him. and i have a problem with that. ban me if you don't like my opinions. i wouldn't wanna be a part of an organization who banned me for having a fucking opinion anyway.
i think it's wrong. yes wrong. and so i'm gonna speak up.
let's pose another hypothetical situation.
in situation a:
man a murders man b.
clearly man is doing something wrong.
in situation b:
man c sees man a murdering man b. and does nothing. let's assume, if he had chosen to act, he could have stopped the murder.
then I say that man c has done a fucked up thing.
inactivity and passivity when you see something fucked up going on is... yes... also fucking wrong.
“Immaturity is the incapacity to use one's intelligence without the guidance of another.” - broseph manny