I am a lazy lazy poker player.
I don't record my results well, I don't review my sessions enough, I don't post enough hands, I don't study enough. I also don't play enough, but that one is unlikely to change what with me working 35 hours a week and doing full time university.
I have been running bad for an extended period of time, which actually isn't that many hands - something like 30k hands of break even poker. That isn't fun. Some of it is running bad and I'm certain there's some bad play in there as well. (PokerEV tells me I'm ~$800 down on expectation over that time.. at NL100 that's pretty harsh, but whatever.)
It is now time to do something about the lazy bit. First up the results from my extremely short session yesterday at Cake:
62 hands / +$91.30
I had actually intended to play for a couple of hours, but ended up going out for dinner instead. I ran pretty good. I played okay, felt a little bit rusty after not playing for about 2 weeks. I felt like I had a pretty good handle on my table after 30 odd hands. One guy was a sooperdooper calling station, one was a bit over aggro and bluffed too much, one was more of a nit than me and there was one decent tag and a pretty tight shortstacker.
A couple of hands:
Villain here is the guy I thought was pretty weak-tight. When he reraised me I pretty much put him on QQ+ and AK. I think there's practically zero chance he had anything less. I'm not really sure what I'd have done here if I'd flopped an overpair.
Hand #1221011480001126: Chelsea (6-Max) 11480
Seat 4: Aggro guy (66.65 in chips)
Seat 7: Decent Tag (157.75 in chips)
Seat 8: Neilis (161.30 in chips)
Seat 9: Villain (100.00 in chips)
Seat 10: Shortstacky (65.26 in chips)
Shortstacky: posts small blind $0.50
Aggro guy: posts big blind $1
Dealt to Neilis
Decent Tag: folds
Neilis: raises to $3.50
Villain: raises to $12
Shortstacky: folds
Aggro guy: folds
Neilis: calls
*** FLOP ***
Neilis: checks
Villain: bets $20
Neilis: is all in
Villain: folds
Neilis: returns uncalled bet $129.30
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Neilis: mucks
Neilis wins $63.50
I guess he had AK or perhaps QQ. He might fold QQ there but I doubt it. There's no way he folds KK or AA.
Hand #1221011480001078: Chelsea (6-Max) 11480
Seat 4: Aggro guy (89.30 in chips)
Seat 6: Callingstation (40.00 in chips)
Seat 7: Decent Tag (231.85 in chips)
Seat 8: Neilis (135.80 in chips)
Seat 10: Shortstacky (40.61 in chips)
Neilis: posts small blind $0.50
Shortstacky: posts big blind $1
Dealt to Neilis
Aggro guy: raises to $3
Calling station: folds
Decent Tag: folds
Neilis: calls
Shortstacky: folds
*** FLOP ***
Neilis: checks
Aggro guy: bets $3.30
Neilis: calls
*** TURN ***
Neilis: checks
Aggro guy: checks
*** RIVER ***
Neilis: checks
Aggro guy: bets $12.95
Neilis: calls
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Aggro guy: shows (Pair of Fives)
Neilis: shows (Two Pairs, Sevens and Fives)
Neilis wins $37.55 with Two Pairs, Sevens and Fives
I figure this guy for opening with a pretty large range. I've seen him open K5s from UTG+1. I don't think he's a total donk though. I could check-raise the flop as well but decided to just check call. When he checked behind the turn I was 100% sure I was in front and decided it was better to induce a bluff on the river because he probably wouldn't call with A high or K high or something like that.