Villian is a table regular of the underachiever calling station mould. Makes .50 bets for information all the time and otherwise calls alot and bets big with made hands.

I bet the turn flush card asa semi-bluff to induce a fold with no luck.

Should I have checked behind on the river instead of risking a big CR by firing off another barrel in attempt to make him fold his possible cheesy 5 high flush?

PokerStars Pot-Limit Omaha High, $0.25 BB (7 handed)

CO ($8)
Button ($3.25)
SB ($15.15)
BB ($32.10)
Hero ($33.40)
MP1 ($43.30)
MP2 ($9.65)

Preflop: Hero is UTG with , , , .
Hero calls $0.25, MP1 calls $0.25, 1 fold, CO calls $0.25, Button calls $0.25, SB completes, BB checks.

Flop: ($1.50) , , (6 players)
SB bets $0.5, BB folds, Hero raises to $2.95, MP1 folds, CO folds, Button raises to $3, SB calls $2.50, Hero calls $0.04.

Turn: ($10.50) (3 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $5, SB calls $5.

River: ($20.50) (3 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $7, SB folds.

Final Pot: $27.50

Results in white below:
Hero has Qc Qd 7c 7d (three of a kind, queens).

Outcome: Hero wins $20.50.

I wouldve checked. FYI im still a PLO newbie. guess his straight draw missed, though he shouldnt have called on the turn if thats what he had...

don't see what hand u beat is going to give u action on the end.

i probably would have checked behind on the turn to give myself a free card because you don't want to be cr-ed there. On the river, i def check behind.