by Felonius_Monk » Tue Dec 07, 2004 3:56 am
To expand on this, if you have a hand good enough to raise, why not raise the max and take full advantage?
If you're playing Party/Empire, where the blinds are stupidly large in comparison to starting stacks, I can see a good argument for making 1/2 pot raises etc in LP with strong holdings, as you don't want to be pot committed preflop.... Usually, though, in a "normal" game with 100-200BB stack minimum, a raise should customarily be the size of the pot. You are in essence correct that a major reason for raising in omaha is to build the size of the pot and allow a BIGGER pot sized raise on the flop, which may (especialy at party) put you all in, or at the very least totally committed to the pot. However, it shouldn't be overlooked that clearing away a few limpers with certain hands and "promoting" some weaker features is another good reason to raise the level of the playing field, and with hands like QJT8ds you might clear out a few players with suited queens or kings, making a later made straight into a winner. I wouldn't ever MINIMUM raise though, except maybe as a joke to piss off DODGYKEN when he limps.
Monk
xxxxx