I agree100% with North's points.
I have to tell AS that 100K hands of Texas Holdem doesnt give the accurate results that you are thinking. 100K hands is a good measure but results from 100K hands of poker can be dramatically different if variance kicks.
I have also seen the case of a few players who dont know crap about statistics, probability theory or proper poker strategy doing quite well in a sample that according to AS standards is significant.
Run some numbers with your winrate and SD for the last 100K hands and you will find that running at 1/6 of that over another 100K hands is not that unlikely. Also a winrate based on 100K hands is less reliable than what you think.
In conclusion, 100K hands is nothing in Holdem
...and i've heard about somepeole who have lost big bankrolls in much less than 100K hands...
[17:16] alitomr:
http://micropenis.ws/forum/viewtopic.php?t=723
[17:19] mekosking: wow
[17:19] mekosking: i give that poof a week tops
[17:19] mekosking: before he snuffs it
[17:19] mekosking: I THINK THAT MAY BE NV
[17:20] mekosking: IN DISGUISE
[17:20] alitomr: LOLZ