by starstealer » Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:07 am
Well, I still haven't played much there, and there are issues. (For more on my initial impressions, check my journal):
1. No wait lists. This isn't a big deal now because the tables are sparsely populated anyway. Later, it could be though. I'm told this is already being tested for production.
2. No hand histories. Again, until this becomes a contender among other poker sites, I don't think this is a big deal - but it would be nice. I'm told that it will be coming soon.
3. Looks: well, its a bit of bland brown for the most part, but the setup is reasonable. The table lists for ring games are all just put together - I suspect once they have more occupancy, they'll add in separators for the different games. As it is now, it is very easy to find the games that are populated.
The tables are circular and are 9 handed or less. No avatars - so its sparse. However, it does have an easy look - so it is easy to read and understand what is going on. The action buttons are reasonably placed.
In terms of speed, without having stats, I wouldn't really know. It has an element of "seeming" slow - but in reality I think this is more of a perception as the cards come out at a reasonable speed, but the action buttons take a 1/2 second to appear initially. When I get an opportunity, I'll try counting out the hands and see what falls.
Overall, I'm not overly impressed with it, but from comments made by the host of the site (to a friend of mine), there are plenty of updates coming.
"How's life treatin' you Norm?"
"Like a baby treats a diaper."