Last night I had a nice long, beautiful post going and the battery on my laptop went out. Truly, some of the finest prose the English language has ever seen. Alas, there is no auto-recovery on web browsers. I was too pissed to rewrite it all last night, so I just went to bed.
Thanks T, I had to use the add chips feature yesterday
. I should have figured that out, since I play at PS here and there, but I'm used to Bodog and UB where I just click the ole add chips button. Per your warning, play chips came up, but about 3 seconds later it auto-switched to real money.
I played several short-handed sessions yesterday, and won about four cents. Growing pains. Here is an interesting hand: I have about a $17 stack and am in the BB w/
. A LAG is in the CO (covers table). LAG has been raising the last three hands then potting the flop and everyone has folded. UTG limps, LAG raises to 55c (10c/20c blinds), BTN calls, I call, and UTG calls.
Flop:
($2.30)
Checks to LAG who pots it, BTN calls, I call, and UTG folds.
Turn:
($9.20)
I open push, LAG thinks for a long time and finally calls w/
, BTN auto-mucks and I don't river an out.
I open pushed here for a few reasons. I don't want LAG betting so much that LAG gets pot committed and has to call me. I don't want LAG checking and BTN trying to take the pot away, again killing my fold equity. I have LAG on two overcards, and BTN on maybe one pair or just A high (BTN was capable of good calls like that). I figure my push is big enough to get a good deal of fold equity and if I get called, I have a ton of outs. In retrospect, I think I need to lead on the flop, and if LAG raises me, then I need to push in right there. I'm not sure LAG folds A high even then, but probably a better chance than when he picks up the flush draw.
I also played an hour or so of 3/6. I was quickly stuck $50 (standard) but came back to win $11.50. I cleared $10 of bonus in the process, so I think I may throw in an hour of limit here and there to keep the bonus clearance on track.
Also played some 10NL SH at UB and picked up some stats. I still need several hundred more hands before I get a reliable picture of my play, but I do appear to be completing the SB too much. I was sort of aware that I was completing with more marginal hands than normal, but didn't think I was doing it that much. I'll work on that today.
I also did some multi-tabling yesterday at both Cake and UB, and I handled that pretty well, so I think all is well on that front. I'm thinking I will just fire up one table and try to develop some solid reads in about 30 hands or so, and then add a second table rather than my usual firing up of three tables all at once. This seems preferable, not just for SH play, but more generally, so I probably should have been doing it even while playing FR.
Journal Changes:
I'm making a few changes to the way I post in the journal. First, I'm going back to the old weekly division (Mon.-Sun.) rather than the current (Sun.-Sat.) one. I made that change initially because I was just playing NL all week then limit on Friday and Saturday. I'm not doing that now, and Sunday still feels like the end of the week rather than the beginning, so back to the old.
I'm not going to be posting daily stats anymore. They are boring and almost completely insignificant. Particularly, as I learn a new game, I want to be focused on longer-term results rather than daily. I will probably still mention how the day went, but I just want to remove my focus from specific results. I will report weekly totals on Sunday along with current bankroll and Monthly total.
Stats will be replaced by hand histories or by some concept I want to think about. I should be able to come up with one interesting hand each day, especially since I'm playing a new game. If I can't come up with an interesting one, perhaps a terrible one in which someone donks off a stack, whether that be me or someone else donking to me.
Bankroll/Moving Up Changes:
Making a change here as well. Old system, which I have posted on several times previously, is three up/three down. I don't want to do that unless and until I'm comfortable with this shorthanded stuff. I really only followed that method in NL, since I just played whatever decent limit game I could find from 50c/1 up to 5/10. So now, I'm just going to focus on being a winning player at each level. I want 10K hands at 10c/20c. If I'm in the black, at the end of that stretch, then I'll move up. I'm not really concerned with winrate, since I think whatever winrate one has after 10K hands is so liable to be highly inaccurate. If I'm only a 1bb/100 winner, then that might be a reason to just give up on short-handed play. While I'm content right now to just break-even or lose a bit, I won't be in a few more thousand hands. At that point, I will want to be profiting from the knowledge I've gained in all my previous mistakes. At the next level, I'll again log 10K hands and move up if I'm a winner; rinse and repeat.
I don't plan to change this approach until I'm up to 200NL. Assuming I win at previous levels, I'll be really well-bankrolled for 200NL, but maybe not so much for 400NL. It looks like it will take between four and five weeks for me to put together 10K hands, so I'm covered for the remainder of the summer on this bankroll approach, and I have plenty of time to think about the next strategy. BK6 is working on something, so I may adopt what he comes up with.
"A big day in my career was the day I realized that tomorrow I would still be a tilter." -- Tommy Angelo