No, my notes bare striking similarity to yours
Now and again if I see a player do something specific that I think might be of benefit i'll note it down - one example would be if I see a player in a PLO8 game put in pot bets to chase a low-only hand I'll put something like "call pot bets chasing low". Likewise, if I see a guy in PLO showdown a winner with 348T after calling a raise PF I'll put "plays any 4 cards even for raise" or something.
I'm not wildly keen on getting TOO specific about a player's habits in the notes as I think it can sometimes throw you - lots of people seem to vary their play a lot in omaha (more so than holdem) and so ascribing very specific behaviour to them can be misleading I think - it would be a no-no in my book to put something like "always smooth calls with top two" just because I saw a player smooth call with top two or "always slow plays top set" because some players seem to vary the way they play hands almost at a whim (although partly due to the conditions of the game as well). Knowing relatively rough attitudes of a player in certain situations can be useful though, so in the "slow playing of top set" situation I might put something like "capable of slow-playing then fast on turn" or something more general.
To be honest, I play mostly at cryptologic (probably about 60-75% of my table time) and the notes feature there is useless as there's 7 or 8 different sites and the notes don't transfer from one site to another (although I think there may be a method for doing this.. anybody know?). I note-take fairly regularly at party/prima though, and a good amount of it is stuff like "Fish" and "LAG".