yeah... i experienced either remarkably tight tables (probably whores) or LAGtastic tables... not much in between. to be fair, i didn't give it much of a shot. i hate that site.

I often find good tables in the weekend (with Brian and MVP on them), but the play is different from sites like UB.

On UB I can 3-table $50 PLO completely on routine and I average a big profit there, even if I make a mistake here and there. On Martin's it seems that I have to play my best game in order to break even. This is not a result of people playing too tight, but it is a result of constantly facing big decisions/huge bluffs, and also that with flopped top sets I'm about 1 for 7. It's very hard to win a showdown, and very easy to lose a stack, so your profit comes from making your opponents fold.

So in theory the games are good, only I'm not able to profit from it

Ojingo, you saying that the games are good when fish like me and mvp are on the table?