by kdiddy33 » Thu Jun 09, 2005 6:18 am
Here are my numbers. They are good, but...variance has me concerned about a few things.
total won....$2,133
total bet.....$1,650
Plus/Minus..$483
ITM%.........48%
ROI%........29%
1st 100 SNGs - played exclusively at Pacific:
total won...$885
total bet....$550
Plus/Minus.$335
ITM%........58%
ROI%........61%
2nd 100 SNGs - mix of Pacific/PokerStarst and Ultimate Bet
total won...$618
total bet....$550
Plus/Minus.$68
ITM%........42%
ROI%........12%
3rd 100 SNGs - all at UB
total won...$630
total bet....$550
Plus/Minus.$80
ITM%........42%
ROI%........15%
From this trend, I can see that I killed at Pacific (obviously), but when I've moved to the less fishy sites, its a little tougher. This makes sense to me. There are differences in the games, as at Pacific you only get $800 in chips and blinds go up every 15 hands, while at PokerStars and UB, you get $1500 in chips, blinds are times. I didn't care for PokerStarts as much as UB personally.
I think that as I've played more, I have found myself playing less straight forward, trying to make more cute plays. I think that may be a leak in my game. Although, at UB, there are normally 4-5 players at each SNG that have decent skills and play more frequently (I keep notes on each player and level).
Obviously, I didn't expect (but hoped!) that my first 100 games would be indicative of how I would continue to play, but I'm a little surprised/concerned by my ROI drop off at this level. Am I reading too much into this?
Good, you?