You are to the right of the bring-in a three flush.
Scenario A: You have (Q2)7. There is one of your suit out and only one deuce. The player to the left of the bring in (showing an ace) raises to $2 and it folds to the player on your right, who calls. $2 to call and there's $8.30 in the pot ($2.80 from the antes, $.50 bring-in, 2 $2 bets).
Scenario B: You have Q2(7). There are none of your suit out and none of your cards are showing. Two players are showing aces, but otherwise, the doorcards are 9 or lower). The bring-in is on your right and the player to the left of the bring-in (one of the 2 aces) raises. The player to your right calls. Again, it is $2 to call and there's $8.30 in the pot.
Scenario C: You have AK(7). There is one of your suit out. Two players are showing aces and one has a king. The bring-in is on your right and the player to the left of the bring-in (holding an ace) raises. The player to your right calls. Again, it is $2 to call and there's $8.30 in the pot.
One of these scenarios is actually true. Perry Friedman is the raiser and the player on my right is new to the table. On fourth, Perry caught an ace and I folded to his bet. I made a comment that I had a three-flush and he said he couldn't think of a single case that he would call a complete with a three-flush with only one caller.
I'm presenting these scenarios because in all three, I would call to see 4th. I know for a fact that I'm too loose in Stud - but I figure most 3-flush hands can stand up pretty well for a single raise, getting 4:1 to improve. I'm not sure of this (and hence the reason I am posting it), so I figured I'd try to get some opinions on the matter.
/dStatistics: Posted by starstealer — Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:18 am
]]>