As I am playing .50/$1 it seems that the hands I played in .10/.20 and .05/.10 do not really tell me much any longer or do the stakes played mean less and the results of the individual hands and their success or failure the important factor and therfor I should keep them all?
To anyone out there that plays $2/$4 or $3/$6 or higher and also uses PT, do you keep your old nickel and dime hands you have logged. At what point, if ever, do you decided that the hands you played at the lower levels, do not really give you an accurate representation of the success or failures certain hands could produce or not produce. For example, A-10o could prove to be an excellent hand from any position at .05/.10 and .10/.20 but start showing itself to be a loser at the $1/$2 or $2/$4 levels because of the assumed smarter play at higher levels. In this example the hand may show a profit overall, but is in fact a loser at the higher levels.
Thanks.Statistics: Posted by StarliteCoast — Fri May 05, 2006 10:51 am
]]>