]]>
]]>
And my BB/100 is back up.
Maybe it's the nature of these games (again, micro-limit online), maybe it's just that I can't figure out how to soar as the eagle, hell maybe it's just variance.
But I think I'm going to stick with more mouse-like play for now since it's working for me.
/shrug
Statistics: Posted by BigPhish — Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:21 pm
]]>
]]>
Im having the same kind of problems with these autoratings..
But i went from a Rock to an Eagle...and have now moved to the Bomb icon which is ultra aggressive...
I wanted to change my game from a rock...but i think ive gone to far..and im betting a lot more post flop...although im still tight preflop..
But can someone explain the ratings for the turn and river....they are 0.10 according to these new autorates..
That seems to touch low to me.....is that aggresive at all...becuase the ultra aggresive is 1.70 for both turn and river...
Now this seems a lot higher than 0.10... an Eagle is TAA....but is 0.10 aggressive ??
Maybe im not reading this correctly....but can someone explain this to me....mayve this is the reason im being over aggresive..
Many thanks
Statistics: Posted by Jos — Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:25 am
]]>
I’m still missing a vital piece of info: VP$IP (you can play fairly loose and still be <25%). And I’m not sure this is the place to discuss this.
However, assuming the figures you’ve posted are for all hands in PT, I can tell you don’t have enough hands to take any change like the one that bothered you seriously. A jump from <7.0 to 8.5 would indicate that. The larger the number of hands, the harder it would be to make a distinctive change.
Unless, of course, you’ve been raising every single hand PF, which I doubt. You’ve already realized the futility of raising to get people out, and I have a feeling you haven’t subscribed to the Mike Caro theory as yet.
Carry on. You’re doing fine.
Statistics: Posted by Wizdar — Sun Jun 05, 2005 3:58 pm
]]>
Too high?
Statistics: Posted by BigPhish — Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:38 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>