]]>
]]>
- the pot odds were marginal (as i said), but the implied odds were great even if he had to split.
- as for the dead money and pf call, you still seem to be thinking of pot odds. i won't disagree that the pot odds weren't hot.
- you know what a nut high str8 looks like, so i'm not going to spell it out for you. as i said before, i don't really care about splitting with so many people putting money in the pot. i'd certainly rather scoop, but i don't think it's necessary.
- you don't have a bajillion opportunities at a live lo8 table... you're lucky to get more than 20 per hour from what i've been told. i think everyone is pretty much thinking the same thing, so...
- you keep talking about the nuts, and i just don't think that this game was one in which you really needed to play nut-only hands in order to be profitable (clearly). if you keep waiting around for the nuts in a live O8 game, you risk getting killed by the blinds/rake and by not getting paid off when you hit. you seem to have been mentally scarred by some LO8 nutpeddlers. get some help.
- i'm glad to see that you're selective about your farm animals. now if you can just teach some of that to Monk and MVP.
Statistics: Posted by Kuso — Thu Mar 30, 2006 9:35 am
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
On the turn he has a non nut straight with no redraw to anything other than an asskicking, and it was the PERFECT flop. If the turn was an 8 then he'd have the nut straight, but have to dodge higher str8 outs, plus every low card in the deck that will almost assuredly make a split pot. He would have 4 boat outs, but they'd be to an underfull.
Yeah, this is a loose limit game and can be played as such, but I find it hard to believe that it is a +EV call, even with the 7:1 implied odds preflop.
Statistics: Posted by JDLush — Wed Mar 29, 2006 8:03 am
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>