I think you played the turn how I'd have played it. You're not winning high, and it seems extremely likely you ARE winning low on your own, so a chop seems likely if you call/check it down. I like the raise here, his bet is extremely weak and of course he should;ve laid down (he must've been a calling station to call you down here, though, did you not have that read on him?). He "only" has $70 left, so the worst that can happen here if you move him all in is that you get 3/4ed and lose an additional $35 trying to buy a $65 pot in which he may well have every intention of laying down. Your big worry of course is if he holds nut low as well (relatively unlikely, but certainly very possible) in which case you are drawing fairly thin, or dead. Of course, if he's a calling station, you consider your options very carefully, probably call it down and take your likely 1/2 pot, but given this guy had a decent stack I'd credit him for being half reasonable and apply pressure on that turn.
Quick bit of maths here..... there's $65 in the pot. He has $70 left. If you raise all in and get halved (very likely) it's neutral EV. If you raise all in and he folds, obviously beating you for high with practically any 4 cards, you win the extra half of the money on the table that he would've got in a check-down split (so $64 instead of $32... $32 profit). If he calls and you're giving up 3/4 of the pot (probable if he has the nut low too) then you're losing half of what you put in, another $70 so half of that is $35. If you force him off nut low (not going to happen, but you never know...) you will of course win the extra 3/4 of what's in the middle, but we won't bother taking that into account. What we can take into account, though, is the possibility he has nut low also BUT that you have outs to win high (or that your 44 is winning it anyway), which gives you a bit more value if he calls you with the potential range of 3/4ing hands he might have.
So... 3 situations can occur if you raise
You are called and split with your security low. Makes no difference.
You are called and lose $35 to a nut low with a better high. However, you quite possibly have some outs for high yourself in this spot (unless he has the flush with A4) so the $35 "loss" in EV terms is perhaps a bit lower.... I will approximate it to maybe $30 or so, possibly even less.
He folds and you win $32 you wouldn't have anyway. Of course, there was the possibility that he had something like a bare set, you could've scooped if he called and thus the real EV win figure for you is slightly lower...
If you genuinely thought he was weak and was more likely to fold than to call then it looks a good bet to me. Your read was wrong, I think, not the bet. And even then, not too far wrong; you still had outs, and he still possibly should've considered folding, though I think ultimately he has to back himself to win half here and the pot was too big to pass with nut low.
I don't think you played this too badly, I could very well have done the same myself, but a crucial element in making the play is that the guy will toss his hand more often than he calls.
Remember as a quick rule of thumb - each dollar you put in and get quartered heads up, you will get half a buck back. You will lose half your bet. (therefore if quarter of the current pot is bigger than half the bet it's a no brainer; if he bets $50 into a $100 pot you have to call even if you think he's quartering you).
If you bluff/win a pot without showdown where you would've been halved if there's a showdown, you win half the pot.
Anyhow, I think your biggest error was playing that hand in the first place for a raise. You could fold the flop but for me that's a bit weak with a big stack, and if you play that hand you won't see a better flop, so....
OK, just my two cents on the matter!
Monk
xxxxxStatistics: Posted by Felonius_Monk — Thu Feb 24, 2005 11:14 am
]]>