]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
- when you raised, did you expect to take it down? did you need to take it down to continue?
- there aren't a lot of turn cards that you'll REALLY like (four 6s), so either you want to get it all in or you don't. playing aggressively only to turn passive and hope to hit a big hand (some of which may not be good) is fucking ugly.
- against a bad player who overplays marginal hands, calling and value-betting when you hit might be a decent plan... but that's not the read.
- putting yourself in difficult situations like this from oop is -------------ev. i recommend keeping it simple (in the myriad ways that can be manifested).
- as played, i might check/call the flop to see if i can pick up the fl draw and/or the 6. that being said, that would be more of an "action play" rather than a mathematically correct play.
Statistics: Posted by Kuso — Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:13 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
I don't like your hand that much only because none of your draws are to the nuts. You could conceivably be crushed here in every way. If you hit a T you could still be behind, if you hit a J for a straight it's not the nuts.
Statistics: Posted by MTPaid — Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:39 pm
]]>
$.25/$.50 PLO
5 handed, Villian has $75, Hero covers
Hero in SB w/
![[9d]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/9d.gif "The Nine of Diamonds")
[7s][8c][Td]utg, villian, button all limp, hero completes, bb checks
Flop ($2.50)
![[Ts]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/Ts.gif "The Ten of Spades")
[Kh][7d]hero checks, bb checks, utg checks, villain bets $2.5, button folds, hero raises to $10, fold, fold, villain raises to $30, button folds, HERO??? (villain has $44.90 behind)
Statistics: Posted by MBuckler — Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:55 pm
]]>