Confusing, I know i don't know why they don't just change big BETS to big BLINDS for NL/PL games. Perhaps because they're big BET games, and therein lies the paradox.
Whatever.
A pokertracker BB is half a "real" BB in statistical terms for a NL or PL game. 10BB/100 = 20BB/100 in reality. Unless they've sorted it since then, which I believe not as my spreadsheet stats inform me (judging on about 37 hands per hour) that I make close on 30 BB/100 in PLO. Pokertracker is saying about 32, although if I mix in my Party/Empire and Stars stats it actually drops to a bit under 30.
I am a losing player in my last 10k hands at Party/Empire, for 100 and 200 PLO, so my stats at these two desperately similar sites have very different winrates! interestingly, both Party and Crypto have loose tables, Stars is generally a tad more tight, and yet there I am a fairly solid winner. Massive winner at Crypto, Decent winner at Stars, loser at Party/Empire. Maybe it's just small sample sizes, but frankly my huge winrate and low variance at the other sites suggests to me that my Party/Empire stats are just crazy
Monk
xxxxxStatistics: Posted by Felonius_Monk — Tue Jul 12, 2005 4:25 pm
]]>