To be honest it seems to be folks programming limit bots at low levels on the most common sites - the best win rate I could see was 5BB/100 at 1-2 Limit Ring - not earth-shattering although obviously if they are running 9 bots across 3 sites 24/7 they can make a lot of money.
I am not at all concerned about whether I am playing a bot or a human to be honest - in NL to get a bot to outplay a human must be a nightmare anyway.
The 'team' play forum seems very lightly used (4 posts) and I think that co-operative swarms of bots are unlikely for several reasons (multplies their chance of getting spotted for one). If folks want to cheat by co-operative play as humans there are already plenty of ways of doing that.
It is certainly an interesting intellectual challenge to formulate a winning bot's strategy - and some of their posts might be very interesting strategically - as after all a bot will play perfectly to a system unlike a human.
They are going to get into an evolutionary war with the Poker Sites though - if Party makes $2bn/year and sees them as a threat they are going to be able to throw a lot of resources at the problem (for example a lot of MMORPG's have bot issues and those that want to handle them quite well). Whilst they know that they are cheating and deserve to get banned and their money confiscated if caught, I don't think it's the end of the world (it reinforces my desire to play NL though
To be honest with the ability to cold-read an entire table before sitting down that I now have at Party NL (30BB/100 for each of my 3 tables since I started using PT observer hand histories and GT+ 3 days ago) I feel that I'm outevolving the bots for a while yet..Statistics: Posted by excession — Mon Nov 22, 2004 7:35 pm
]]>