[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/feed.php on line 173: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3888)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/feed.php on line 174: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3888)
Live Poker Forum - Online Poker Forums & Hand Analysis Poker Forum 2006-03-27T19:18:24-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/feed.php?f=27&t=6302&mode 2006-03-27T19:18:24-06:00 2006-03-27T19:18:24-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=100436#p100436 <![CDATA[There is No Joker in Poker]]>
I have continued to play off and on in single-table SNGs. I really enjoy them, even when I lose. I have now played in 12, won 4, 2 seconds, 2 third place finishes, 2 fourths, one ninth and one tenth. Admittedly I am playing at a low level, but this surely can't continue. I'm almost afraid to move up. I've been reading comments in the SNG forum and I see that others of you are keeping very sophisticated ratings on yourselves. I will take a leaf out of your books and see what the future brings. I love the finite nature of these little one-table tourneys with their beginning, middle and end. They usually take about an hour which is a nice little bite. What fun. Hope the "fun" part lasts.

I read somewhere that one's playing style may do better in some types of games than others. Maybe I am seeing this for myself. The consistency rate, albeit over a very small sample, is good enough to warrant more of my time in SNGs than other kinds of games, whether they be limit or no-limit. I have been doing all three lately, and the other two seem to be very streaky. I do okay in limit games but it feels like I am spinning my wheels much of the time. It is very hard to get ahead of the curve. I can't say I'm ready to make that a full-time occupation. On the other hand, no limit brings out the fear factor in me and I have to back off and calm down in a limit game. The SNG's on the other hand, just keep grinding along.

Statistics: Posted by Poquette — Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:18 pm


]]>
2006-03-16T14:50:13-06:00 2006-03-16T14:50:13-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=96963#p96963 <![CDATA[More SNG results]]>
I was absolutely on tilt after winning that SNG yesterday! It's funny, I get so high on adrenalin after a win that it feels like tilt. If I hadn't been so full of myself I would have registered for another SNG immediately. But I had to wait until today in order to calm down. This is ridiculous, I know. We're talking here about a $15 win. But I repeat, it's the principle of the thing.

So . . . I entered another identical event on Poker Stars today, same pony up and same prize pool. On the third hand I was dealt KK and was planning to raise but someone else raised before me. So of course, I reraised. The flop came Qxx and I thought it would be safe to go all in and I was called by the original raiser who had AA. I never win with Aces, so I was hoping for a king on the turn or river but just to rub it in, a third Ace appeared. So I was all in and all out lickity split.

I immediately entered another one and this time, long story short, I won again. So I now have notched 2 out of 3 as a winner. I really thought I was going to bust out again because there was so much pre-flop raising and I feared blinding myself out. But some of the other high chip stacks beat themselves and suddenly I was 3rd out of 3 players. Then I turned on my attack dog engines and managed to mow them down one at a time. I am wondering whether I surprised the socks off them because I had been folding pretty much the whole time and acting like a Caspar milque toast. Here are my stats for this SNG:

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 65 hands and saw flop:
- 5 out of 14 times while in big blind (35%)
- 5 out of 15 times while in small blind (33%)
- 5 out of 36 times in other positions (13%)
- a total of 15 out of 65 (23%)
Pots won at showdown - 5 of 6 (83%)
Pots won without showdown - 8

I'm curious whether these stats are good, bad or indifferent. Anybody out there know of a norm I can compare myself to?

By the way, I use a masculine handle on Poker Stars. I acknowledge that this is a man's game and I use the masculine handle because I feel -- rightly or wrongly -- that it avoids the stereotypical response that some people have to a female player, evening the playing field, so to speak. I do love the anonymity of the internet. What a joy.

Anyway, this technique of laying low at first and then shifting into total aggressiveness at the end seems to work. It takes a lot of discipline to fold hand after hand, but wow, the payoff!

I will continue at this level for a few more days to see if my strategy continues to work for me and then I will start moving up the food chain.

Statistics: Posted by Poquette — Thu Mar 16, 2006 2:50 pm


]]>
2006-03-15T16:33:57-06:00 2006-03-15T16:33:57-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=96750#p96750 <![CDATA[I won my first SNG!]]>
It has been a while. I have been traveling more than usual which is more disruptive than I would have believed. I have been playing poker sporadically, if at all. But in the past month or so I have gone back to playing on line to "tweak my game," as someone said. On line, it needed a lot of tweaking. I have been playing mostly on Poker Stars which is a mixed bag. I really like the environment, the software, etc. But sometimes I really wonder if the place is rigged. I have gone 20 and 30 hands with no card higher than J and zero pairs. In fact, I've gone entire sessions with no pairs. But this is all beside the point. Eventually it seems to work itself out.

I was reading in the forum on SNGs because I have been playing in a lot of them -- mostly play money -- and somebody had written about their success in the micro arena. And I got inspired to enter a one-table 10-player event at the $3.00+ $.40 level. This will, of course, be laughable to all you pros out there. I was playing for third place, which was the pay-out cutoff. I thought I should be able to outlast seven players with my extremely tight style. Poker Stars conveniently provides a place to take notes, which I avail myself of to record my hands. This helps me put in perspective what seems to me the long strings of absolutely wretched cards. Turns out the "long strings" are rarely longer than 15 hands, although as noted above, on occasion they can stretch out to as many as 30-35.

Long story short, I actually won the tournament -- took down a whopping $15.00! I was absolutely ecstatic. Couldn't have been more thrilled if it was $1500. It was the principle of the thing. My strategy paid off. Here were my stats for this little 48-hand tournament:

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 48 hands and saw flop:
- 4 out of 8 times while in big blind (50%)
- 3 out of 8 times while in small blind (37%)
- 7 out of 32 times in other positions (21%)
- a total of 14 out of 48 (29%)
Pots won at showdown - 5 of 5 (100%)
Pots won without showdown - 4

Hard to believe a tournament could be won with 9 hands played. Look at that! I won every showdown! I dropped a fair amount of chips twice but folded before the river because I could see I was probably beat, or if two players were all-in I have learned not to interfere in another player's attempt to reduce the field! I'm sure this was a bit of a fluke, but until the last few hands I never went beyond the flop if I didn't already have the best hand. I'm not a chaser. This is probably a flaw in my game, but it works for me.

Here are the cards I was dealt as reflected in my notes on this tournament. All hands were folded unless a point figure follows which indicates the size of my stack after action in the hand. Ostensibly good hands like TdAc or TcKh were raised preflop and I folded. The plus or minus signs indicate the direction of my chip count, "bb" means big blind, and the rest is self-explanatory I believe. Beginning chip stack: 1500.

JKh (saw flop, two went all-in and I folded), 3cQd, Td6c,
4dTc bb, 2d7s, T6s, 2cTs, Jc7h, 32s, Td2c, TcJs +2830, 48h, 7s2h,
Qh3c bb, 7d6h, TdAc, 7s7h, 6d4h, 7d8h, Qs5d, 45c, 86s,
3sTc bb, 3d8s, As5c, 4s2d, TcKh, Qh4s, now down to 5 players
JsKc bb -1875 (folded on turn - two went all-in) 9c8s, Jc3h, TJs +2450, 9s6d,
7c3d bb, 6c5h, Kc8s, As8h +3025, 5c2h, AKs +4450, KsTh,
6h6d bb +4475, JKh +5760, 94s, 6Ts, JcAh +7810, 9Kd +12445

At this point, I was heads up and didn't have time to record the last two hands.

My poker guru TUP (The Unknown Player) would have been proud. He recently evaluated my play and his main observation was that I seem to be playing scared. This was hard criticism for me to assimilate. I thought that if it was true, I did not belong at the poker table. I needed to work that out of my psychology or quit the game. So I've been working on this. As the field narrowed in this tournament, i.e., after it got down to 4 players, then I started to really get aggressive. I raised preflop on every hand if someone else hadn't already raised, or I folded.

Even though the stakes were low, this was a very good experience. I feel that I played almost as well as it is possible for me to play. If you can visualize this at all from the sketchy information I've presented, I would enjoy your comments.

Statistics: Posted by Poquette — Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:33 pm


]]>
2005-09-13T19:22:24-06:00 2005-09-13T19:22:24-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=47107#p47107 <![CDATA[There is No Joker in Poker]]>

Thanks for the warning about the SH games. I will watch my P's and Q's.

Statistics: Posted by Poquette — Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:22 pm


]]>
2005-09-13T12:48:52-06:00 2005-09-13T12:48:52-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=46989#p46989 <![CDATA[There is No Joker in Poker]]> Statistics: Posted by bobby — Tue Sep 13, 2005 12:48 pm


]]>
2005-09-13T12:24:19-06:00 2005-09-13T12:24:19-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=46983#p46983 <![CDATA[There is No Joker in Poker]]> Statistics: Posted by Poquette — Tue Sep 13, 2005 12:24 pm


]]>
2005-09-10T12:40:59-06:00 2005-09-10T12:40:59-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=46159#p46159 <![CDATA[There is No Joker in Poker]]> Statistics: Posted by Tiburon — Sat Sep 10, 2005 12:40 pm


]]>
2005-09-10T12:09:09-06:00 2005-09-10T12:09:09-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=46156#p46156 <![CDATA[There is No Joker in Poker]]> Statistics: Posted by Poquette — Sat Sep 10, 2005 12:09 pm


]]>
2005-09-10T11:52:33-06:00 2005-09-10T11:52:33-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=46153#p46153 <![CDATA[There is No Joker in Poker]]> Statistics: Posted by Tiburon — Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:52 am


]]>
2005-09-10T11:20:42-06:00 2005-09-10T11:20:42-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=46147#p46147 <![CDATA[There is No Joker in Poker]]> Statistics: Posted by Poquette — Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:20 am


]]>
2005-09-10T05:30:27-06:00 2005-09-10T05:30:27-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=46091#p46091 <![CDATA[There is No Joker in Poker]]> Statistics: Posted by Kuso — Sat Sep 10, 2005 5:30 am


]]>
2005-09-10T02:08:51-06:00 2005-09-10T02:08:51-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=46082#p46082 <![CDATA[There is No Joker in Poker]]>
I played poker today for the first time since the debacle almost two weeks ago. The break I took to work on TUP's book was just the thing I needed to clear the cobwebs and reestablish the confidence, etc.

TUP has written a killer book. I can't wait till it hits the streets and I can buy copies for all my friends. As an alumna of TUP's workshops I can tell you that he has included in the book a generous helping of professional advice designed to turn the reader into a winning player. Beyond that, I probably should say no more without clearing it with the author. We worked at a feverish pace right through the Labor Day weekend to get it whipped into shape. Trust me, it is going to be THE book in its niche.

So I went back to my old familiar haunt this afternoon. There was one seat open at one of the four $1/$2 blind $200 max buy-in no limit tables. Things were hopping. I sat down in seat 9 as a wild hand was in progress. Four people were all in and three of them split the pot -- they all had J9 to complete a Queen-high straight. It was a huge pot but they all essentially got their money back plus a small contribution of early bettors and the other poor guy who went all in with a set of something -- I can't remember now what it was. After that, there were three other split pots during the first hour, one of which I was in, where a full house appeared on the board. So those of us left after the river split. This really was a get-your-money-back proposition.

After I'd been at the table about 45 minutes I finally played a hand where I had JT suited and the flop came Jxx. I was hoping for another J or a T but it didn't come, and since I hadn't played a hand except the split pot since I sat down, I decided to play it out and figured that if I lost it would at least be good for my table image. It was impossible to put anyone on a hand because these were very loose aggressive players at this table. Obviously, there were many hands that could beat mine, but the board didn't pair and there were no straight or flush possibilities. I decided to try to bull my way through to the end, but unfortunately the only other tight player at the table had actually flopped two pair and, regardless of my agressive betting, he wasn't going anywhere. When we turned over, I had lost about $75 on the hand. Oddly I wasn't too upset because I knew it was a calculated risk, and as it turned out, it did help my table image because the effect was that at least one player got the idea that I would bet when I didn't have much.

Shortly after, I was dealt As7s in the big blind and nobody raised pre-flop, so I checked to see it. The flop came Axx and I decided to bet out and see where things stood. I put $30 out which was about one and a half times the pot, and all but one folded. The opponent was a visitor from Switzerland who looked to be college age or thereabouts. He was very cute, very charming and after calling my bet he had about $37 left. The turn came something nondescript, and I bet $50 which more than covered his stack. The Swiss kid looked at the board for a long time. It was as though he was trying to will one of those cards to change suits, or something. Maybe he was just trying to figure out what I had. He really wanted to call but he had already gone to the cash machine twice to rebuy chips and he decided finally to fold. I didn't have to show my hand, and it turns out that aggressiveness paid off because I heard him tell his friend that he had two pair, which would have beat me. He obviously put me on three aces, and he knew I was a rock at this point. But hey! I was happy to rake in this little pot. This got me back up to about $175.

About a half-hour later I caught pocket Queens on the button -- the best hand I had the entire session. There were seven callers to me and I raised to an even $10 just for the heck of it. The blinds folded and I got four callers. The flop came rainbow rags and everybody checked to me. I decided there was enough in the pot that I'd be happy to take it down right there, so I made it $35 to go. By the way, one thing I had observed about this table was that these guys were all like online players who will stay in, checking around all the way to the river in case they might catch something at which point the real betting begins. So my $35 bet was kind of an informed bet. I was assuming that since no one bet or raised that I probably had the best hand at that point. But with people like this, you can never be a hundred percent certain. All but one folded and the turn produced another rag. My opponent made as if to bet but then thought better of it after he looked at me and saw me smiling at him. (The charm offensive at work!) So he checked, I made it $50 and he called. A Jack came on the river and he looked to see how much I had left -- about $80 -- and he put me all in. I called immediately. Much to my surprise, he was apparently bluffing because he folded when I called. So effectively I doubled up on that hand. I may not have played correctly on the turn. If I had bet, say, the pot on the turn, he might have folded then. I wouldn't have doubled through, but I think in retrospect it would have been safer. I may have been counting too much on the ragged board. But it was a big pot, and I was happy to win. As I have said, however, I do well against players who are worse than I am. I should be so lucky to meet guys like this. I am still scratching my head!

A couple of hands later, the Swiss boys ran out of money and left. Two other people stayed for one more hand and then got up to go. I decided to go as well. The dynamics of the table were evaporating. I'd been there two hours and left having played exactly four hands (plus I saw a couple of flops and folded) with a net profit of $176 -- not bad for a rank beginner.

I think my execution still needs some work. I took some risks here and I never had the nuts. But I'm pleased with the results. I'm pleased with my discipline and my willingness to bet out aggressively. And most of all, I am happy to have notched a winning session. I seem to have emotionally forgotten about the bad day a couple of weekends ago.

But I do have one psychological problem that lingers and I wonder how common this is. (A problem, you say? Okay, there are more than one, but let's deal with first things first!) When I get ahead I suddenly don't want to put my winnings at risk. I start thinking about leaving the table and pretty soon I do. Consequently, I usually end up with a short session of one or two hours if I am winning. I like to win early before people can see that I have a tendency to fold ad infinitum. If I am not winning, then I end up staying for hours in a kind of paralysis. It becomes too late to bet because if I do everyone folds and I get no action. I have almost concluded that short and sweet is best. But I would like to get over that desire to quit while I'm ahead but before I pick up some big bucks. How can I do that? Has anybody out there experienced this?

Later . . .

Statistics: Posted by Poquette — Sat Sep 10, 2005 2:08 am


]]>
2005-09-05T14:49:12-06:00 2005-09-05T14:49:12-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=44722#p44722 <![CDATA[There is No Joker in Poker]]>

Statistics: Posted by Poquette — Mon Sep 05, 2005 2:49 pm


]]>
2005-09-05T14:31:26-06:00 2005-09-05T14:31:26-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=44718#p44718 <![CDATA[There is No Joker in Poker]]> Statistics: Posted by TheUnknownPlayer — Mon Sep 05, 2005 2:31 pm


]]>
2005-09-05T11:17:50-06:00 2005-09-05T11:17:50-06:00 https://livepokerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=6302&p=44694#p44694 <![CDATA[There is No Joker in Poker]]>
I am pleased and delighted with all your friendly responses and welcoming messages. As TUP mentioned, I have been slaving away on his manuscript and actually have not made it back to the poker table this weekend. But getting his book into the hands of the public is a higher cause and I am heeding the call, as it were.

Before this goes much further I need to disabuse some of you of an understandable misconception. It is true that I am of the female persuasion. However, it has been several decades since anyone referred to me as a "girl." Beyond that, I have nothing further to say on this subject than that, out of kindness, you understand, some gallant types might describe me merely as a woman of a certain age. I wish it were otherwise, but there is nothing I can do about it but accept it gracefully. I hope we can all still be friends anyway!

Gotta get back to the manuscript now. Alas, the next installment of my journal is going to have to wait. But all in good time.

Later . . .

Statistics: Posted by Poquette — Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:17 am


]]>