But his error was substantially worse than mine. If he bet smaller, I would have still called, but at least he wouldn't lose nearly his whole stack.
And how about let's be results-oriented! If I bet the flop, he would have folded and I wouldn't have taken 90% of his stack on the river!
Statistics: Posted by EscapePlan9 — Sat Jul 22, 2006 4:32 pm
]]>
Statistics: Posted by Stoneburg — Sat Jul 22, 2006 4:12 pm
]]>
And when I say that...I mean...I'd call...
stong = weak...correct?
Good work though.
Statistics: Posted by GreaterThanU — Sat Jul 22, 2006 4:05 pm
]]>
Villain has been LAGgy and luckboxed the majority of his stack.
Blinds 300/600
VILLAIN 8000
HERO 7000
Villain limps. I check with
![[6c]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/6c.gif "The Six of Clubs")
[3c].Flop is
![[Ac]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/Ac.gif "The Ace of Clubs")
![[9c]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/9c.gif "The Nine of Clubs")
![[9d]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/9d.gif "The Nine of Diamonds")
Villain checks, I check (I usually bet here, dunno why I didn't)
Turn is
![[2d]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/2d.gif "The Two of Diamonds")
Villain checks, I check again (no point betting now)
River is
![[2c]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/2c.gif "The Two of Clubs")
Villain pushes all-in.
He likely thinks I've completely missed here but wants to take down this smallish pot anyways like the LAGtard he is. I think for a little bit, then call with my 6-high flush on the double-paired board. He had 65o.
Statistics: Posted by EscapePlan9 — Sat Jul 22, 2006 1:32 pm
]]>