For me joining a table full of little stacks with one big stack who is a bad player is ideal.
Statistics: Posted by excession — Mon Feb 07, 2005 7:26 am
]]>
I'm actually seeing some slightly tighter play at the NL $25 tables or maybe it's just the fact that the bankrolls are smaller with those who play at those tables. Now, I am not saying it's better play, but people actually don't call a pot sized bet with J7o on a board of Q 8 4; I cannot say the same thing at the NL $50 tables...
Anyway, bad players are abound everywhere, and I don't neccessarily like playing big stacks...but I have noticed that there are a tremendous amount of larger stacks on the NL $50 tables who have no clue at all and want to increase your bankroll. i think the best thing to be said about these 6-man tables is that it is easier to isolate the idiots...most of the time.
Statistics: Posted by Danhdan — Sat Feb 05, 2005 2:25 pm
]]>
My questions are these. What criteria should i be using for my table selections? Excession recommends only 1 decent sized stack at the table, but so far this week, the players that have had them have gotten those stacks more by luck than any degree of skill and this has been up to about 4x the buyin. I have also tried to pick tables by pot size, and this seems to be a somewhat more accurate indicator of a "good" table.
Also, is there any way to see a "players seeing flop %" like there is on Prima? The tables I have sat down to in the 9-13$ pot size have had around a 20-25% seeing flop according to PT but I was wondering if there was another way to find this. thanks.
It has been an experiance this week, but a profitable one.
sonicboom
Statistics: Posted by sonicboom — Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:06 pm
]]>