As for Party, sometimes I push them around. Sometimes they push me over the edge. Both the games and the players are rarely good, but NEVER dull.
Statistics: Posted by Cactus Jack — Sun Feb 06, 2005 4:30 am
]]>
]]>
Last week I was $200 up over 1000 hands at the Party $25's plus a $150 bonus release.
So far this week I'm $85 down at Party after 500 hands, but have a $150 bonus coming in another 500 so I'll still probably end the week up there (I'm up on UB and Prima this week too so I'm doing OK).
Of course it is very frustrating sometimes but that's why I have Rome Total War installed for stress-relief on the suckout days..now excuse me while I go and slaughter some Gauls
Statistics: Posted by excession — Sat Feb 05, 2005 6:38 am
]]>
]]>
]]>
1. I was hopeing someone could explain to me why (from what I have noticed) there is very little talk of the NL on Party?
- I'm guessing this is do to the fact that there is a far smaller amount of "play" involved, and the different between players of differnet levels is essentialy smaller in the end? I would then also assume that the longterm profitabilaty would be slightly higher, but the swings would be much greater?
I'm sure this is something that has been covered here one million and five times. But I couldn't find it.
Hopefully I'm not chased away like i'm sure I would be at other forums for asking such a bland question.
Hope You are tooo rough on the NewGuys
Skelt
As you can see I didn't major in English lol
Statistics: Posted by Skelt — Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:00 am
]]>