]]>
]]>
]]>
I'm just curious as to why you didn't CB. Is one of them a CS, or are you just trying to keep the pot size down OOP? (No criticism implied, just trying to improve my game).
Statistics: Posted by NorthView — Mon Aug 21, 2006 5:02 am
]]>
You got roped in the way the turn action went.
It's very obvious that at least one of them has AK.
But since it was never much more money to you, you're getting good odds to fill up.
Given turn action I think Wivil shows up with KQ or 89 or something more often than AK.
I am pretty sure most people would push AK in that spot when the betting was reopened.
Anyway, I prefer betting the river because with a guy all-in and a dry sidepot he'd usually have to have a monster here to bet if you checked to him, because he still has to beat the all-in guy so can't bluff.
And if he does have a monster then he's going to call or raise your river lead anyway.
Whereas he could call a smallish bet with a twopair type hand that would otherwise check behind.
Statistics: Posted by shobute — Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:25 am
]]>
I think he puts *me* on AK, maybe
![[Ah]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/Ah.gif "The Ace of Hearts")
[Kh]. maybe ![[Kh]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/Kh.gif "The King of Hearts")
[Qh], maybe [Th], maybe even a mid SC of hearts. but with just 360 hands and being a slight loser, i don't see how he doesn't make some sort of river value bet on AK here. Then again, this is the reason i posted. i'm wondering what other people would do with this hand on the river. but personally, i think AK is the only possible holding for him on this hand.
Statistics: Posted by Stelvask — Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:43 am
]]>
Do you think he is good enough to lay down the str8 or did he overplay AQ?
Statistics: Posted by AlexMR — Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:19 am
]]>
]]>