As played you gotta call his last 50 with this pot odds.
I can almost certainly remember Iceman and Shobute discussing a similar hand when the turn came a horrible flush/straight card. I think they said it's a mandatory bet/fold if you have the overpair without the flush draw, and a mandatory check behind if you have the flush draw.
If I'm already behind I'm not drawing out, so I lose the same amount as if I were to call a river bet by just folding. If I am ahead and they're drawing, I make them pay or fold.
Does this sound right? If either Shobute or Iceman reads this could they clear this up for me if this is the proper play?
I really wanted to check behind k3nt, but I thought I remembered reading a similar post by those two guys who would own me at NL 6-max and decided to bet. What I thought was their conclusion made a lot of sense to me. If I never read that post (or imagined it) I definetly would have checked behind.
This is good logics, but you don't consider stack sizes applying it. If you were more deep and you could comfortably fold to reraise it is a better way to play, but with this stack if you bet anything you are commited, so I prefer check behind on turn.Statistics: Posted by Zmej — Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:44 am
]]>