Statistics: Posted by shobute — Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:40 pm
]]>
]]>
I don't think you should think about building a big pot with this hand. You're not drawing remotely to the nuts in any direction, and your opponents hand isn't defined at all.
On the other hand your hand is going to be best in a small pot almost all the time.
I think I'd check behind against a stationish opponent, and go for value on the river.
Statistics: Posted by Smokin'Al — Tue Sep 19, 2006 6:10 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
if villain is tighter, better, and working to put you on a hand, then i like a bet. your hand is pretty well disguised, and i think you can get a decent villain to fold JJ/TT/A9 with a turn bet, and a decent villain is less likely to check/call flop, check/raise turn with a set/straight.
i also think you overestimate how much you'll get paid on your outs. an 8 makes the board look pretty scary, and even idiots are learning how to tell when a flush is possible.
jon
Statistics: Posted by ua1176 — Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:05 pm
]]>
Full stacks.
Hero has
![[Ts]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/Ts.gif "The Ten of Spades")
![[9s]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/9s.gif "The Nine of Spades")
, and raise first in OTB to 7, villian calls in the BB.Flop (pot 15):
![[9d]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/9d.gif "The Nine of Diamonds")
![[7s]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/7s.gif "The Seven of Spades")
![[6c]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/6c.gif "The Six of Clubs")
BB checks, Hero bets 12, BB calls.
Turn (pot 39):
![[3s]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/3s.gif "The Three of Spades")
BB checks, Hero checks???
IMO hero should bet here as he has a billiion of outs if he is behind, he also can be ahead. And importantly if his draw hits (and with this ammouns of outs it will happen very often) he can win a huge pot by building it on the turn.
Thoughts?
Statistics: Posted by Zmej — Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:46 pm
]]>