The trouble is when I do hit on the flop. I try to continue my aggressive betting, don't letting on I'm really strong by playing weak. Also, as I have learned, to 'build the pot'.
However I usually get folds. And so I feel that I'm not getting paid for the hands that are supposed to be my biggest earners.
On the other hand, I realize that slowplaying can get you into a lot of trouble. But there must be something inbetween? The hand below can be used as an example.
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (9 handed)
saw flop|saw showdown
UTG+1 ($23)
MP1 ($13.95)
MP2 ($28.30)
MP3 ($8.50)
CO ($23.65)
Button ($28.30)
Hero ($24.55)
BB ($25)
UTG ($25)
Preflop: Hero is SB with , .
UTG calls $0.25, UTG+1 calls $0.25, MP1 calls $0.25, 1 fold, MP3 calls $0.25, 1 fold, Button calls $0.25, Hero completes, BB checks.
: I complete because of number of limpers
Flop: ($1.75) , , (7 players)
Hero checks, BB checks, UTG bets $0.5, UTG+1 folds, MP1 calls $0.50, MP3 folds, Button folds, Hero calls $0.50, BB folds.
: I sometimes bet with a draw like this. But I decide not to this time. The number of players in the hand for one thing. And as I'm first to bet, I have no information yet. After the betting it comes back to me. The bet is only $0,50 and normally I would raise here becuase it's such a weak bet. But I decide to check to see what happens.
Turn: ($3.25) (3 players)
Hero checks, UTG bets $0.75, MP1 calls $0.75, Hero raises to $2, UTG calls $1.25, MP1 folds.
: I now have the nut straight and first to act. Since I checked the flop, betting out here would be a too strong indication of hitting so I check. But the bet is so weak I decide to raise. What do you think about the size of the raise here?
River: ($8) (2 players)
Hero bets $4, UTG folds
I still have the nut straight, but now there's a flush possibillity. I doubt he has it, my bet is hoping for a call. He folds.
Final Pot: $12Statistics: Posted by Soul — Fri Mar 11, 2005 11:53 am
]]>