I have somewhat a hard question now, which is at what point does the board become too drawy that I need to 3-bet? For example, I would not 3-bet
![[9c]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/9c.gif "The Nine of Clubs")
[5s][2h] here, yet I obviously would ![[4h]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/4h.gif "The Four of Hearts")
[5h][7s]. Anyone got some idea where the board becomes just drawy enough that a 3-bet is called for? My guess would be something like
![[5c]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/5c.gif "The Five of Clubs")
[6h][9d] (so what I had earlier only a rainbow), but I wasn't even sure a 3-bet was right here so I'm curious if you guys think this is close to correct. Once again thanks for all the help.
Statistics: Posted by DoctorHandles — Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:56 am
]]>
If we 3bet this flop we should be raising to about $65, and if the then pushes it is $35 to call in a $200 pot so even if he does have 2pair, we have to call given the odds. There is no way you can possible 3bet then fold this flop as his range will be wide enough that we have an enormous amount of equity against it for the odds we are given.
Statistics: Posted by GodlikeRoy — Tue Jun 26, 2007 3:58 am
]]>
]]>
I got into this spot today and villain had AA. The board was a little less drawy (and I had position) so I called his flop minraise and shoved over his turn bet
Without position and with the draws out there, a 3-bet is called for here. You should be ahead of his range.Statistics: Posted by Triple B — Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:27 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>