I read several times - is it still good?
I am starting out 4 tabling at the 25s and over about 12 hours last week finished up 6 buy-ins. I find my self winning a bunch of small pots with aggression and using positional advantage. I have been caught a few times shoving with air when I get played back at and I am getting an idea about who I can get to lay down a marginal hand and who will not. I have also been paid on my monsters from those same players. I find that my cards are no longer terribly important, as they are in the showdown FR NL live games that I play.
I am reminded of Xaston calling low limit NL 6-max "whack-a-mole". I have learned that mini-raises at NL25 6-max really does mean monster. Bet sizing is generally lost on my opponents. The site I am playing allows a player to flash one or both cards when folding. I am amazed at the hands that my opponents are showing me that they are laying down when I raise them.
The downside of the site that I am playing, from a new-to-NL-6max perspective, is that it is not PT compatible. If I had to estimate, I am running about 25/19/4. I almost never limp first in, I will raise about 30-35% of my hands from LP, and I CB almost always unless the flop is stupid coordinated, I missed it, and I have more than one opponent.
So. . .6-maxers - does that sound about right? Does the game change much as you move up? Anyone have an opinion on the PT supported sites v. the non-PT supported sites? I am planning on moving up to the 100s after I can manage to play 3 straight sessions of 4 tabling nl25 without timing out (I still time out several times a session).
geiststaat, Seb, MTpaid:
If you guys have anything to add or other basic questions like mine, lets post them. I also intend to post a hand or two each day, but the HH feature at the site I am playing is far worse than Cake even, so I will do what I can.Statistics: Posted by emmasdad — Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:44 am
]]>