I raise AA to $15, BB calls. BB is same villain from the 4-bet w/KK hand I posted. He is 34/26 and very aggro postflop over 100 hands.
Flop [5s][2h] $32
Villain checks, I bet $25, villain C/R's to $70. (this is why we bet the flop here!)
I decide to just call and shove over villain's likely turn bet (if no spade). I am almost 100% sure that villain has a flush draw.
Turn $172
Villain checks, I bet $125, villain shoves. I obv snap call. Villain got pretty greedy here as I would rarely fold here after betting this turn. The word spewtard comes to mind.
Anyway...the main question I have is how everyone likes the call on the flop against an aggressive villain when we are quite certain of his holdings and can play perfectly later in the hand. Or do people rather we charge the villain by 3-betting the flop? Obviously my play is fine sometimes but what is the "best" or "default" play?Statistics: Posted by Triple B — Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:06 pm
]]>