not sure if it's important and what it really says, but there it is...
Statistics: Posted by RedBarracuda — Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:32 pm
]]>
Think thats the standard progression...
tight TAG > sLag / Lag
and also 6max to shorter handed eventually HU play.
I think its a benefit to understand the play at each specturm, very tag 13/10 and very lag 26/24, then its easier to switch gears when suitable and get inside openents heads more. So w/e really if OP feels its time to open up the game and is prepared for the higher varience and initial drop in winrate then go for it I guess but standard route Id wait till 100 and 200nl and open up there.
Statistics: Posted by SinkRox — Mon Sep 24, 2007 5:27 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
I was wondering if the softness of Pacific Tables does help to attenuate this.
Anyway, I'm paying ~4.30PT/BB on Party and Cryptos playing at 25/15 w 3.15 flop AF
At these levels rake sucks. Thats why bonus chasing is so important to build a roll quickly.
Statistics: Posted by Tatarana — Sun Sep 23, 2007 5:35 pm
]]>
]]>
Maybe some of you remember my first 5ish posts here. I think and hope I have gone a long way since then (and that was March this year)...
cheers
p.s. tatarana, why is rake as % of pot interesting or important? TBH I never looked at it and still don't know what that number actually means and shows...
Statistics: Posted by RedBarracuda — Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:34 pm
]]>
Statistics: Posted by excession — Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:09 pm
]]>
here is mine
Statistics: Posted by Tatarana — Fri Sep 21, 2007 7:21 pm
]]>
]]>
As you said, your turn AF is low.
Are you playing on Pacific ? If so , can you post the rake as % of pot ?
Statistics: Posted by Tatarana — Fri Sep 21, 2007 2:39 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
note: recently I upped my turn aggression as well as my PFR% and am playing closer to 20/20.. i completely stopped limping and almost completely stopped calling raises except sometimes in position against some players..
thoughts?
Statistics: Posted by RedBarracuda — Fri Sep 21, 2007 2:12 pm
]]>