]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
And seat 3 is effectively the BB and is last to act.
Statistics: Posted by black_knight6 — Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:59 pm
]]>
]]>
![[Ts]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/Ts.gif "The Ten of Spades")
, ![[Js]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/Js.gif "The Jack of Spades")
![[9s]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/9s.gif "The Nine of Spades")
, ![[Qs]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/Qs.gif "The Queen of Spades")
, he either leads or check raises with those hands.Statistics: Posted by Twelver — Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:58 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
If we assume Gold had
[9s] instead, would we think it was a bad fold by Doyle?Seriously. Would you consider posting a thread called "Awful fold by Doyle" then? We're all a bit result oriented I think.
I don't think hands like 65s are 'impossible', but I think they are less likely than higher flushes. I'm also not at all sure that Gold would bet something like J9s on the flop, it's a good chance he would, but far from a sure thing. After all, 6 people saw the flop, it's a bit of an action flop and his position is bad. A bet on this flop would usually be either a strong hand or a bluff, not something inbetween.
Statistics: Posted by Stoneburg — Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:06 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>