]]>
The way you played it. I bet about half pot on river but don't expect to be paid off. You are either splitting or he's folding but you obviously aren't checking behind or folding at all. he could have QT though.
Statistics: Posted by briachek — Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:53 am
]]>
the reason i mention it is this very situation. i would bet half pot here, and this pot is a little thin. anyway, i think a lot of people will call a t700 bet with a pocket pair. you'll be CRed all-in if villain holds a 3, Q, or 33.
it's also likely that you won't get called at all. you attempted to induce the river bluff by checking behind, and he didn't bite. that probably meant that he was chasing the flush (which whiffed) or had 33. i have to think that a Q would make some attempt at a value bet here.
i get this feeling that you're going to say he CRed and turned over 33.
Statistics: Posted by Kuso — Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:35 am
]]>
I almost always bet out trips for the reasons you just pointed out as well as the fact that if he has a Q as well he has to pay to catch his kicker and fill up on me. He could also have a flush draw.
I bet $300 into a $750 pot and he calls.
Pot is now $1350 and the turn card is
![[3d]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/3d.gif "The Three of Diamonds")
. Good card for me because although now I split if he has a Q, I can't really lose this hand to a flush. In fact now I want him to catch his flush and I really gain nothing from betting here so after he checks the turn, I check behind.
River is
![[Td]](https://livepokerforum.com/images/smilies/Td.gif "The Ten of Diamonds")
. Pot is still $1350 and he checks. How much now? He has $1980 left.
Statistics: Posted by MTPaid — Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:37 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>