by Marm » Mon Sep 24, 2007 7:13 am
I had a great little essay on this idea a while ago, and was just about to post/publish it when SSH came out and said all the same shit basically. Now I don't even know where to find it. Dammit.
To weigh your overcards (and bluffing) outs, just figure out how often they will be good. Lets say in hand one you think (to make the math easy) That Q's or A's will win it for you 40% of the time. Since we need to eliminate the Qc, that leaves 5 out, multiply that by 40%, you get two outs. or about 5% or 19-1.
But what if you think a flush on the board will allow you to steal this pot X% of the time? Not a realistic scenario with two other in, but if you had been HU from the Flop on, AcXc (with x being face) could be played this way. If you think they will fold to the 3 flush 20%, then take your 2 Overs outs, add that to the 10 club 'outs' left x 20%, you get 4 outs total, for 10% or 9-1.
This use of bluffing outs is difficult to use in limit since by the river the pot odds are usually good enough for them to call. In NL you could make a bet big enough to make them want to go away. In limit you really need to have a read that they have a good read on you, and that your bluff fits into a pattern that will scare them.
"Rooting for the Yankees is like rooting for the house in blackjack." -Adam Morrow
I swear to God, next time I have to come back here, I'm bringing a stun gun and a weedwacker!