So here are most of my relevant stats for the last 19 days of $1/$2 NL 6 max at FTP and Cake. I couldnt be happier with results, but theres always room for improvement. Im sure some will say Im too passive preflop, but my post flops aggression numbers are pretty damned aggressive. Maybe I play better post flop than preflop?

My percentage for continuaton betting seems low. I think Ive been checking against 2 opponents too often. HU I CB most flops.

Anyway...here you go...

Folded BB to Steal
Folded SB to Steal

Both seem a bit high

Att to steal blind
Won$ when saw flop
PTBB/100
Pre flop raise %
River Aggression

All seem a little low.

P.S. I just kinda compared it to my last 15k hands. I don't really know much about PT numbers at all.

P.P.S. Won at showdown is obviously high but not something you really wanna consciously try to change. And PTBB/100 is obviously the same, but given that ridiculous of a won at showdown I think you should definitely be winning maybe like 11 PTBB/100 or so.

I think your stats are pretty much perfect for 200NL Cake where players are rather loose PF(an interesting thing i noticed compared to my stats is that 60% of my raises there are no flop / no action compared to your 50% but that is probably because 400NL at Ongame is tighter PF and I play at 21/18/4)

I'm sure you know this but you should probably get up your PFR% when (if) you continue back to 400NL+.

Very solid, Nh.

Something is seriously wrong with the last part of your stats. It shows that nobody ever folded to any of your river bets or raises, which is very screwed up.

Still...here are some thoughts:

I disagree with Xaston that your folded blinds to steals are too high. They look fine to me, bit I'm a lot tighter than Xas is.

Attempt to steal could be higher, but its OK. Its actually a lot higher than I would expect from a 11% PFR guy. This, coupled with how tight you are in the blinds must mean you limp a lot in EP, which is bad IMO. I mean, its probably fine against your opposition but is terrible against good players.

Won $ when saw flop is fine too considering your stationy opposition, although its inflated by your high W$@SD so maybe it should be higher.

I agree that your PTBB/100 is good but should be higher given your opposition and high W$@SD.

The Cake HHs arent perfect. Some of the numbers are definatley a bit strange. although Im not sure which ones your referring to here.

I have to admit that Im surprised that Im getting comments that my win rate should be higher. I dont think its possible to be all that much higher than 9. At least Ive never done it long term at $200NL or higher and I dont remember seeing more than 1 or 2 other people over 10 with a significant sample.

Im ecstatic with my win rate. I dont have enough hands on anyone to get a true win rate but when I look at the top 15 or so regulars in my database (some of who I cant seem to beat) and avg all their hands together to get a large sample, the avg is about 7.5.

The comments on your winrate are based off the fact that your W$SD is so high and that you're playing against worse players.

You have a 61% W$SD and a winrate of 9ptbb/100.

Take Xaston and my own 6max stats for comparison:

Over his last 15k hands he is running at like 7ptbb/100 with a W$SD of 53%.

Over my last 18k hands I'm running at 6.25ptbb/100 with a W$SD of 51%.

I think all of our winrates are pretty high (compared to average, or even compared to the average winning player) but you have to factor in the small sample size for this.