Villain sat down with a full stack a couple hands back, so no reads. There was a 60/8 donkey with a ton of chips at the table a moment ago, but he went into a tailspin and Villain busted him when they got all in on a KQx flop in a limped pot. Villain's KQ held over donkey's JT. I'm about to stand up but don't uncheck auto-post in time. I'm dealt [Kc]. Mmkay...

Folds to Villain in SB and he makes it $6. I make it $18. He calls. I start the hand with about $350 and he covers.

Flop ($36) [6h][4h] He checks, I bet $28, and he calls.
Turn ($92) He checks, and I?

Suppose I checked behind.
River He quickly bets $90. Call or fold?

I like a turn check and I think that river is closer to a fold that to a call, in general people don't bluff often enough in such situations (reraised pot + scary board).

I actually think people bluff in this situation quite alot of the time. I flip a coin and decide whether or not to call.

Call.

I fold because too many hands get there...however, it's SUCH a bluffable spot...better spots though.

I think I lay this down to someone who I have some experience with and who *knows* that I've made some stubborn calls in these spots before. But my hand looks a lot more like a whiffed AK or a pair below JJ than an overpair, and I couldn't imagine why he was so sure I'd pay him off for full pot at this point. If he has something like TT I could see a check or a block, but not pot. Now if he has no showdown value and senses weakness from the check/check on turn his bet makes sense. I called pretty quickly and he had [Qh].

I would check the turn with the and bet the turn without it, considering the stack sizes. As played, fold more often than call, but call sometimes.

D