Villain is 18/12 over 80 hands with a 30% attempt to steal. He has raised my sb before and I have yet to play back at him.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (5 handed) Converter Tool from (Format: Bet The Pot)

UTG ($91.60)
MP ($200)
Button ($103)
SB ($115.60)
Hero ($117.40)

Preflop: Hero is BB with , .
3 folds, SB raises to $4, Hero raises to $14, SB calls $10.

Flop: ($28) , , (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks.

Turn: ($28) (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $17, SB calls $17.

River: ($62) (2 players)
SB checks, Hero?

Flop check seems bad and such that you couldn't convince me otherwise unless there is a lot more info about you and villain that you didn't mention.

Getting CRed on the flop blows no?

I think I get CRed a lot here and don't really want to be given 2:1 to call a shove with a flush draw when he probably has more nut draw flush draw combos in his range than non-nut (if he has any).

So I'm guessing this is wrong (and I should be CB/shoving turn as the other line then), but I thought he was opening light on the SB but his 3-bet calling range was somewhat narrow (as is typical for my stakes, especially against this type of opponent). I thought AJ was maybe in his range, AQ probably was, and AK probably was not, and I did not think 77-99 would fold to one barrel (granted I could fire two which is what i imagine you think the best line is) and any T (there are not many) and JJ-AA are not folding and very often CRAI on the flop.

If we don't worry about being overflushed most of the time shouldn't we not worry about being overflushdrawed?

yea it sounds like you're assuming stuff about villain when u have no reason to. like trying to put him on a pretty tight range here when he's basically an unknown. 80 hands is not very much.

i agree with 2 barrelling.

as played i probably just check behind.

If he check raises the flop, alot of time its going to be a complete bluff so yes i do think you have FE.

Your awesome draw isnt all that awesome and your implied odds arent that big when a flush hits.

I think its much better to just take down the pot on the flop. Its a reraised pot so its a decent pot already. You want to bet these flops every time when a check raise doesnt scare you that much which it shouldnt here.

Lower flush draws are also in his CRing range. If he called with a suited connector, he's gonna CR the flop if he hit the FD. Axd is also in his range but I think these two factors should cancel out and you shouldnt worry about getting it in with just a Khi FD. Now if you had like 5d 6d or some such... well then you have less equity vs his CRing range.

I agree with Betting the flop, then shoving over the top of a CR is optimal. Checking sucks.

As played you should bet more on the turn... like $22.

Betting the river seems like an okay bet. He has to fold Tx and pairs. He never folds a Q though. He should also fold TJ because any Q beats him. However, there shouldn't be too many Txs in his range pre-flop. I think he has like AQ/QK/JJ here. But TJ,T9 and 77-99 and AdJd or AsJs are also in his range. And he should fold all those because your most likely air hand (AK) now has a straight. I think its probably slightly +ev to fire $47 on the river. You are mainly representing TT, AK, and AQ and to a lesser extent 3x and JJ.

I did not (and still don't) believe lower flush draws or bluffs are in his CRing range. Obviously it's not impossible he has one, but he has one with a very very low frequency. He's basically a nit who likes to steal who I have not been playing back at, hence the preflop 3-bet. He's not going to call me light here PF with 56dd.

I understand 80 hands are not much, but this type of regular is not uncommon at nL$100 stars. That further reinforces my belief he's probably just a typical one of these type of players.

Yeah I was betting tuns way too hard, then started betting them way lighter, now I'm trying to find the right size. Pot was probably $26ish after rake though so it was 2/3 size, which I've been using as a general rule and am probably applying too much.