by Aisthesis » Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:23 am
It's the other way around, actually. Value bet range is always top half of calling range--and is determined by the call range.
B's call range is determined exclusively by bluff prevention. He has to call enough to prevent A from profitably bluffing at 1.
If A never bluffs, B's call range will be completely different. Suppose A value bets only and keeps the same range of [0,1/18]. Now B has to call 8 for a chance to win 9. B thus needs a win probability of 8/17 to break-even. So, now he only calls on with < (9/17)*(1/18), whatever that is.
That's also the reason why the solution seems counter-intuitive to anyone who has in mind the adage that you need more to call than to bet. That's only the case against players who are rarely bluffing.