In this part I present some graphical results of all 34 players with more than 2000 hands. Players 1-20 are winners, players 21-34 are losers.
I do not know, I cannot upload the pictures here nor can I use the [img] command. Anyway, the graphs and some comments can be found in my blog:

http://potlimit-holdem.blogspot.com/200 ... or_22.html

In bet-hte-pot forum I only show my comments to the graphs and if there are some correlations between the BB/100 won or lost and the most important PT numbers:

BB/100 and VPIP
Conclusion: VPIP should be between 15% and 28%, no real correlation visible.

BB/100 and Blinds steal attempts
Conclusion: The winning players have an overall higher number of steal attempts, something like 15-30%.

BB/100 and total postflop aggression
Conclusion: The winning players have an overall higher medium aggression number.

BB/100 and continuation bet number
Conclusion: The continuation bet number is calculated as how often you bet instead of check (1 means equal numbers of bet and check). The bad players else bet too often or not often enough after a preflop raise. Best numbers 2.5-6.

BB/100 and Check-raises
Conclusions: The winning players CR a little bit more often than the losers.





Overall Conclusion:
Aggression is the most important part of a winning strategy (no surprise). However, there are some guys, which take this advice too far.
It is important to continuation bet a lot, which surprises me since there are a lot of calling machines at this level. But the data show it. As for total aggression one should not take it too far. One of the biggest losers nearly always conti bet.
Another thing of interest is the wide range of VPIP and that there is no clear correlation between BB/100 and VPIP. In my >2k sample size there are no guys with >40% VPIP but still a lot of losers. I would have expected that for VPIP<15% and VPIP>30% there would be a significant decrease in BB/100, which is not the case.
Another very important thing to know is that stealing the blinds seems to be very importanat. Nearly every loser does not steal enough. I am surprised that this number is so important.


I hope you found my results interesting and look forward for some replies.

MHFlush