Just because we share genetics doesnt mean crap. Camero and Trans Am share a crap load of parts, that doesn't mean they evolved. Darwinism can't explain the pre-Cambrian explosion. No expert on it OBV, but it is far from settled
QFTGeneral Philosophical / Afterlifish Question
Moderators: TightWad, LPF Police Department
by excession » Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:16 am
As far as molecular bio showing we all evolved from some single cell thing - ???
Just because we share genetics doesnt mean crap. Camero and Trans Am share a crap load of parts, that doesn't mean they evolved. Darwinism can't explain the pre-Cambrian explosion. No expert on it OBV, but it is far from settled
QFT
Just because we share genetics doesnt mean crap. Camero and Trans Am share a crap load of parts, that doesn't mean they evolved. Darwinism can't explain the pre-Cambrian explosion. No expert on it OBV, but it is far from settled
QFTLast edited by excession on Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
excession - Enthusiast (Online)
- Posts: 3872
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 3:52 pm
- Location: manchester uk
by Pwnd » Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:40 am
LOL at "premarital sex is wrong".
That explains a lot about christians i guess. I would also be pretty fucked up I think, if I believed that some god was watching my sexlife, ready to send me to hell.
Regarding the 6000 year old thing: You had a serious runner-up for the republican nomination who believes this. So does a lot of the people voting for him. They also believe that "It is easier to change the constitiution to reflect gods laws". Scary.
I am not saying that non-religious governments can't be oppressive dictatorships. I am saying that religious governments always are.
"Norway and Engand are both theocracies". WTF?
Regarding evolution: You havn't a clue. let's not discuss further.
Beavis, I don't think there are any reason for us discussing. We are never going to agree on this (or anything else I guess). Your arguments doesn't make any sense to me and you will never accept my position (or even answer posts without being insulting)
@T-rod.
I would still be very interested in your thoughts. You seem a bit more open to dialogue and far more interesting
That explains a lot about christians i guess. I would also be pretty fucked up I think, if I believed that some god was watching my sexlife, ready to send me to hell.
Regarding the 6000 year old thing: You had a serious runner-up for the republican nomination who believes this. So does a lot of the people voting for him. They also believe that "It is easier to change the constitiution to reflect gods laws". Scary.
I am not saying that non-religious governments can't be oppressive dictatorships. I am saying that religious governments always are.
"Norway and Engand are both theocracies". WTF?
Regarding evolution: You havn't a clue. let's not discuss further.
Beavis, I don't think there are any reason for us discussing. We are never going to agree on this (or anything else I guess). Your arguments doesn't make any sense to me and you will never accept my position (or even answer posts without being insulting)
@T-rod.
I would still be very interested in your thoughts. You seem a bit more open to dialogue and far more interesting
You are PWND
-
Pwnd - Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 1:01 am
-
DoctorHandles - Posts: 2401
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:44 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests