Here's one where I raise a strong QQ and am up against AA. Re-raising wouldn't help him either, because I view my QQ as strong enough to call and I have position. This player was a marginal winner in my db before this hand (I have 667 hands against him), but this one put him as marginal loser. He's pretty tight, but tends to overplay hands.
Since the flop was seen HU, I might have made a small bet on my QQ as overpair, but not pot. As it plays, I view myself here as protecting my trips with the full pot bet. My current view, at least, is that full pot will mean a medium-strong hand like this one. Lower bets either mean a very weak hand (such as mere overpair on an relatively uncoordinated board in LP) or else an extremely strong one (such as top set with flush redraw).
My opponent obviously views my bet as simple CB and tries to check-raise me off of it.
PokerStars Pot-Limit Omaha High, $2 BB (9 handed)
MP1 ($78)
MP2 ($79.55)
Hero ($496.90)
CO ($195)
Button ($196)
SB ($185.10)
BB ($321.20)
UTG ($232.70)
UTG+1 ($216.65)
Preflop: Hero is MP3 with , , , .
1 fold, UTG+1 calls $2, 2 folds, Hero raises to $9, 4 folds, UTG+1 calls $7.
Flop: ($21) , , (2 players)
UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $19.95, UTG+1 raises to $54, Hero calls $34.05.
Turn: ($129) (2 players)
UTG+1 checks, Hero checks.
River: ($129) (2 players)
UTG+1 checks, Hero checks.
Final Pot: $129
Results in white below:
UTG+1 doesn't show.
Outcome: Hero wins $129.
UTG+1 has AsAd2d3c