Advanced search

KQ hand

Post your tough limit holdem hands here

Moderators: piersmajestyk, LPF Police Department

KQ hand

Postby Nortonesque » Wed Mar 16, 2005 4:11 pm

Here's a crypto hand from memory that was pretty interesting.

SB is a calling station and will call 1 bet to see the turn on most hands. UTG is TAGish, with 18% VP$IP and 5%PFR, and he might be a little too aggressive post flop (3.75 PFA).

Hero is in CO with [Ks][Qd].
SB posts $.50
BB posts $1

Preflop:
UTG calls $1, 5 folds, Hero raises $2, Button calls $2, SB calls $1.50, BB calls $1, UTG calls $1.

Flop (10 sb): [7s][6s][6c]
SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, Hero bets $1, Button folds, SB calls $1, UTG raises $2, Hero raises $2, SB folds, UTG caps $2, Hero calls $1.

Turn (9.5 bb): [2s]
UTG checks, Hero checks.

River (9.5 bb): [Js]
UTG checks, Hero bets $2, UTG calls $2.

Result:
Hero has a flush, king high
UTG mucks
Hero wins 11.5 bb


What do you think?
User avatar
Nortonesque
Enthusiast (B&M & Online)
 
Posts: 1820
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 5:55 pm
Location: Oregon

Postby TightWad » Wed Mar 16, 2005 4:42 pm

Nawton,

What range of hands did you put UTG on? I'm guessing something like 88-TT, in which case I like your flop 3-bet. I assume your intent was to narrow the field to just you and UTG, and take a free card on the turn (unless you hit a K or Q). My first thought was that 3-betting seemed a bit overly-aggressive, but the more I think about it, the more I like it.

-TW
User avatar
TightWad
<b>Forum Jackass</b>
 
Posts: 1300
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:41 am
Location: I rock.

Postby briachek » Wed Mar 16, 2005 4:43 pm

I think you played this too aggressively postflop. If the UTG is TAGish, he was likely limping with a pocket pair because otherwise he would raise or fold. On the flop, all you can beat is a bad bluff because even if he has AJ or something, he is winning but you may get him to fold. On the turn, I like the check because after he caps the flop, I don't think you can bluff him out so you might as well try to catch your flush.

I think that flop play will usually lose you money and you got lucky this time. I'm 50/50 on calling the cr and looking for a good turn card. once the flush hits, and you just called his cr, he might check the turn anyway and you can see the river even cheaper.
Brian [Js][9s]
Anyone who gets in a fair fight, has no tactical skills.
User avatar
briachek
Semi Pro (B&M & Online)
 
Posts: 6322
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Ewing, NJ

Postby Nortonesque » Wed Mar 16, 2005 6:03 pm

Tighty nailed my thinking exactly. (BTW, how exactly did you get the "Forum Jackass" title?).

Normally I wouldn't bet out against 4 opponents after missing, but that flop probably didn't hit anyone, and there are a lot of bets in the pot. I felt there was a good chance everyone but the SB would fold, as they were all capable.

When UTG check-raises I put him on 88-TT. These are the hands he's most likely to have limped with UTG and now be check raising. He could have 77 here, but I think he's more likely to wait for the turn to bet the flopped boat. There's also a small chance he could be bluffing, hoping I'll lay down overcards. While there are plenty of bets to make the call, I like going for the free card because you also charge the SB.

Unfortunately the free card play didn't work, as UTG caps it. Now I have to see 77 as a greater possibility for him, or maybe something like limping with a big pair, but since he's so aggressive post flop there's still a reasonable chance he's got 88-TT. With 18 small bets in the pot, I call for a K, Q or spade.

When a spade hits and he checks the turn it's clear he doesn't have 77. The rest of the hand plays itself.

I really like the check raise in this situation, but in retrospect it may not have been a good move against such an aggressive opponent.
User avatar
Nortonesque
Enthusiast (B&M & Online)
 
Posts: 1820
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 5:55 pm
Location: Oregon


Return to Limit Hold'em Cash Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests