I don't know how you guys do it.

I lost to more runner runner straights and two-outters there in 3 days than in my entire poker career. The number of times that 80% favorites on the flop lose at that place is sickening. I'm not saying it's rigged...but something's weird.

So I cashed out -$300 and without finishing the bonus (I was 1/3 of the way through it).

Anyone else in the same boat?

That's poker. Playing against bad players means higher variance.

My biggest losing streak ever was at Tribeca, 8 buy-ins.

But I finished well up there, even not including the bonus, because prior to the downstreak I was winning at least a buy-in almost every time I sat down.

It's not fixed. They're just terrible. Refusing to play against terrible players just because the variance is going against you is way -EV.

As soon as I finish a few bonuses that clear at higher rates, I'm headed back to Tribeca. It's on my short list of the fishiest sites around.

I haven't played much there. and only microstakes whan I have, but it takes a change of strategy. Bluffing goes out the window, valuebetting becomes paramount, and not paying off is very important.

My winningest site was Prima. I made 10-15ptbb/100 playing there. At Party I was at a modest 5ptbb/100. Different strokes for different folks... I just wasn't good enough at adapting.

I can also see myself back at the dreaded Tribeca soon. Party has clearly had its day as the site of choice for fish: 80% of 100NL FR tables there are < 25% VPIP. Ugh, as they say. Pacific is no longer the 24/7 donk jamboree it once was, thanks to multitabling and word of mouth.

We need to start our own pokersite, get all the fish there and ban all the good players except ourselves (and we should have 100% rakeback).